1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1964 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1968 Ford Fairlane is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 410 kg more than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 1964 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Fairlane | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2782 cc | 1188 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2290 mm |
