1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1968 Ford Fairlane is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 260 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Ford | Sunbeam |
| Model | Fairlane | Tiger |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 5766 cc | 4261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 27 L |
