1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1965 Volvo 120
To start off, 1968 Ford Fairlane is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (213 HP) has 146 more horse power than 1965 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1965 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 575 kg more than 1965 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 1965 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Fairlane | 120 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6550 cc | 1776 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 213 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2610 mm |
