1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1967 Jaguar 240
To start off, 1968 Ford Fairlane is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1967 Jaguar 240. (131 HP @ 5550 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1967 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 1967 Jaguar 240 | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Fairlane | 240 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5766 cc | 2482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 54 L |