1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1968 Ford Fairlane is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 460 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Fairlane | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5766 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 57 L |
