1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1967 Simca 1100
To start off, 1968 Ford Fairlane is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Simca 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Simca 1100 would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1967 Simca 1100. (57 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1967 Simca 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 360 kg more than 1967 Simca 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Simca 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 1967 Simca 1100 | |
Make | Ford | Simca |
Model | Fairlane | 1100 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 1204 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 47 L |