1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1972 Mazda 616
To start off, 1972 Mazda 616 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 400 kg more than 1972 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 1972 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Fairlane | 616 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2782 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2480 mm |
