1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (213 HP) has 139 more horse power than 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 675 kg more than 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Fairlane | Celeste |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6550 cc | 1410 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 213 HP | 74 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4160 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2350 mm |
