1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1981 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 590 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 1981 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Fairlane | Colt |
Year Released | 1968 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5766 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2310 mm |