1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1982 Mazda 323
To start off, 1982 Mazda 323 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (213 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 323. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 735 kg more than 1982 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 1982 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Fairlane | 323 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6550 cc | 1071 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 213 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2370 mm |