1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1984 Seat Ronda
To start off, 1984 Seat Ronda is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1984 Seat Ronda. (118 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1984 Seat Ronda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 430 kg more than 1984 Seat Ronda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Seat Ronda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 1984 Seat Ronda | |
| Make | Ford | Seat |
| Model | Fairlane | Ronda |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5766 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2460 mm |
