1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1992 Renault Racoon
To start off, 1992 Renault Racoon is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Renault Racoon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1992 Renault Racoon. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Racoon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 305 kg more than 1992 Renault Racoon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Renault Racoon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault Racoon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 1992 Renault Racoon | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Fairlane | Racoon |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2782 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1005 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2770 mm |
