1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320
To start off, 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 (216 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (213 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 95 kg more than 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Fairlane | 320 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6550 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 213 HP | 216 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2700 mm |