1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1995 Honda Integra
To start off, 1995 Honda Integra is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Honda Integra (176 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 111 kg more than 1995 Honda Integra.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 1995 Honda Integra | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Fairlane | Integra |
Year Released | 1968 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1199 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4525 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1325 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2620 mm |