1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Acura TL (176 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | Fairlane | TL |
Year Released | 1968 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2840 mm |