1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1996 Honda Civic
To start off, 1996 Honda Civic is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1996 Honda Civic. (127 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1996 Honda Civic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 190 kg more than 1996 Honda Civic. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 1996 Honda Civic | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Fairlane | Civic |
Year Released | 1968 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5766 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1350 mm |