1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1998 Alfa Romeo 156
To start off, 1998 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Alfa Romeo 156 (187 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 80 kg more than 1998 Alfa Romeo 156.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 1998 Alfa Romeo 156 | |
| Make | Ford | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | Fairlane | 156 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5766 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 63 L |
