1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1999 Acura EL
To start off, 1999 Acura EL is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (213 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1999 Acura EL. (127 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1999 Acura EL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 506 kg more than 1999 Acura EL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 1999 Acura EL | |
| Make | Ford | Acura |
| Model | Fairlane | EL |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6550 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 213 HP | 127 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1079 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4478 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2619 mm |
