1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1999 Lotus M250
To start off, 1999 Lotus M250 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lotus M250 (247 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 450 kg more than 1999 Lotus M250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 1999 Lotus M250 | |
| Make | Ford | Lotus |
| Model | Fairlane | M250 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 5766 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 247 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1180 mm |
