1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1999 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 1999 Rolls-Royce Corniche is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Rolls-Royce Corniche (325 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (213 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Rolls-Royce Corniche should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 1150 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 1999 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Fairlane | Corniche |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6550 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 213 HP | 325 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 2735 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 5410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3070 mm |
