1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1999 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 1999 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1999 ZAZ Wagon. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1999 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 565 kg more than 1999 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 ZAZ Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 1999 ZAZ Wagon | |
Make | Ford | ZAZ |
Model | Fairlane | Wagon |
Year Released | 1968 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 1089 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2330 mm |