1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2000 Ford Laser
To start off, 2000 Ford Laser is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2000 Ford Laser. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 285 kg more than 2000 Ford Laser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 2000 Ford Laser | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Fairlane | Laser |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5766 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2620 mm |
