1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2000 Matra-Simca M72
To start off, 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (81 HP) has 31 more horse power than 2000 Matra-Simca M72. (50 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2000 Matra-Simca M72.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 2000 Matra-Simca M72 | |
| Make | Ford | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Fairlane | M72 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 50 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
