1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2000 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2000 Opel Meriva is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2000 Opel Meriva. (101 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2000 Opel Meriva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 7 kg more than 2000 Opel Meriva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Opel Meriva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 2000 Opel Meriva | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Fairlane | Meriva |
Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5766 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1393 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 53 L |