1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2000 Renault P55
To start off, 2000 Renault P55 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2000 Renault P55. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2000 Renault P55. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Renault P55 weights approximately 370 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault P55, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 2000 Renault P55 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Fairlane | P55 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5766 cc | 900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1770 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 80 L |
