1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2000 Seat Leon
To start off, 2000 Seat Leon is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2000 Seat Leon. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2000 Seat Leon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 99 kg more than 2000 Seat Leon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Seat Leon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Seat Leon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 2000 Seat Leon | |
| Make | Ford | Seat |
| Model | Fairlane | Leon |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5766 cc | 1896 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1301 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 55 L |
