1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2001 Mazda 323
To start off, 2001 Mazda 323 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2001 Mazda 323. (124 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 180 kg more than 2001 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 2001 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Fairlane | 323 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5766 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 55 L |