1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2001 Toyota RSC
To start off, 2001 Toyota RSC is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (213 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2001 Toyota RSC. (194 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota RSC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 189 kg more than 2001 Toyota RSC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Toyota RSC is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota RSC will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 2001 Toyota RSC | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Fairlane | RSC |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6550 cc | 4164 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 213 HP | 194 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1396 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2510 mm |
