1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2002 Honda Passport
To start off, 2002 Honda Passport is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (213 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2002 Honda Passport. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Passport.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Passport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 2002 Honda Passport | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Fairlane | Passport |
Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6550 cc | 3201 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 213 HP | 190 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2710 mm |