1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2002 Nissan Terrano II
To start off, 2002 Nissan Terrano II is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (213 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 2002 Nissan Terrano II. (116 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2002 Nissan Terrano II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan Terrano II weights approximately 40 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane.
Because 2002 Nissan Terrano II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Terrano II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 2002 Nissan Terrano II | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Fairlane | Terrano II |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6550 cc | 2389 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 213 HP | 116 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1625 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2660 mm |
