1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2002 Pontiac Grand Am
To start off, 2002 Pontiac Grand Am is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (213 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2002 Pontiac Grand Am. (148 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2002 Pontiac Grand Am. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 386 kg more than 2002 Pontiac Grand Am. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Pontiac Grand Am, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 2002 Pontiac Grand Am | |
| Make | Ford | Pontiac |
| Model | Fairlane | Grand Am |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6550 cc | 3399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 213 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1199 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2730 mm |
