1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2003 Honda Logo
To start off, 2003 Honda Logo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2003 Honda Logo. (64 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda Logo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 370 kg more than 2003 Honda Logo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda Logo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 2003 Honda Logo | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | Fairlane | Logo |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2782 cc | 1343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2370 mm |
