1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2003 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2003 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 224 kg more than 2003 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2003 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 2003 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Fairlane | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5766 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1176 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1450 mm |