1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2003 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2003 Subaru Forester is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Subaru Forester (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Subaru Forester should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane.
Because 2003 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 2003 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | Fairlane | Forester |
Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5766 cc | 2456 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 60 L |