1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (213 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Condor. (114 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Condor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Condor weights approximately 47 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane.
Because 2003 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Fairlane | Condor |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6550 cc | 2438 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 213 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1632 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2610 mm |
