1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2004 Ford F-150
To start off, 2004 Ford F-150 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford F-150 (200 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford F-150 weights approximately 725 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 2004 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Fairlane | F-150 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5766 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 2125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 5380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 98 L |