1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2004 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2004 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (213 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Wrangler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 37 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane.
Because 2004 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 2004 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | Fairlane | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6550 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 213 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1622 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2380 mm |
