1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (164 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 30 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Fairlane | Lancer |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5766 cc | 2376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 164 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 50 L |