1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2004 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2004 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 25 kg more than 2004 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 2004 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Fairlane | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2782 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1285 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 60 L |
