1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2004 Volvo V70
To start off, 2004 Volvo V70 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo V70 (208 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo V70 should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo V70 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Volvo V70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo V70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 2004 Volvo V70 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Fairlane | V70 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5766 cc | 2520 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 80 L |