1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (213 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2004 Volvo XC90. (208 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2004 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 453 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane.
Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Fairlane | XC90 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6550 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 213 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 2038 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2650 mm |