1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2005 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2005 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 152 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 102 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar X-Type, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 2005 Jaguar X-Type | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Fairlane | X-Type |
Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5766 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1502 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 61 L |