1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2005 Kia Carnival
To start off, 2005 Kia Carnival is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2005 Kia Carnival. (142 HP @ 8800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Carnival. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Carnival weights approximately 820 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Carnival, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 2005 Kia Carnival | |
| Make | Ford | Kia |
| Model | Fairlane | Carnival |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5766 cc | 2901 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 142 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 8800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 2220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2910 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 75 L |
