1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2005 Mazda Etude
To start off, 2005 Mazda Etude is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2005 Mazda Etude. (99 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda Etude. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 355 kg more than 2005 Mazda Etude. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Etude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 2005 Mazda Etude | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Fairlane | Etude |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5766 cc | 1594 cc |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1045 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 55 L |
