1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2005 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2005 Renault Scenic is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2005 Renault Scenic. (137 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Scenic weights approximately 140 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane.
Because 2005 Renault Scenic is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Scenic will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 2005 Renault Scenic | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Fairlane | Scenic |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5766 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 137 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 60 L |
