1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 545 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Fairlane | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 87 L |