1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander (161 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 220 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Fairlane | Outlander |
Year Released | 1968 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 2376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5650 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 60 L |