1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2006 Volkswagen Citi
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Citi is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2006 Volkswagen Citi. (72 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2006 Volkswagen Citi.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Citi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 2006 Volkswagen Citi | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | Fairlane | Citi |
Year Released | 1968 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 1423 cc |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 49 L |