1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2006 Volvo C70
To start off, 2006 Volvo C70 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2006 Volvo C70. (138 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo C70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo C70 weights approximately 298 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 2006 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Fairlane | C70 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5766 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1698 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 62 L |
