1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2007 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2007 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (213 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2007 Mitsubishi Raider. (210 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2007 Mitsubishi Raider. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Mitsubishi Raider weights approximately 200 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mitsubishi Raider, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 2007 Mitsubishi Raider | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Fairlane | Raider |
Year Released | 1968 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6550 cc | 3701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 213 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 5590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3340 mm |